Draft
The “No” Word
As many parents have pointed out, the word "no" can create an avalanche of horribly cascading dysregulation, and not just among toddlers. A toddler's tantrum can be taxing, although sometimes cute, but a toddler's tantrum is never as difficult or as dangerous as the tantrum 'tweens and teens can throw.
A 'tween's tantrum can become a property destroying rampage; and anything a tween can do, a teen can double-down on.
Note: All of these blog posts are based on case compilations involving 100s of children and families that I've worked with over the years.
Mom of an 11 year old: My son can go from zero to tantrum in the blink of an eye.
me: What's the trigger?
Mom: When he hears the word "no".
me: What's the tantrum look like?
Mom: Oh, it's hell on wheels. He swears, tips over furniture, breaks things, threatens me, slams doors, punches holes in his bed room walls."
me: What did you say "no" to?
Mom: He wanted more juice ....
Special note: No, a "whooping" won't help. I'll explain another time.
There are three basic rules for the "no" word.
~ Rule #1) If you say it, you have to mean it and make it stick.
~ Rule #2) Don't say it if you don't mean it.
~ Rule #3) If you say it but don't really mean it, ignore rule #1.
Wait, what? Why ditch rule #1? Doesn't my kid just have to learn to accept a simple "no"? Yes, she does. How many years have you been trying? How's it going so far?
If you are happy with the way things are and want to persist along your current path, carry on.
If you want to try something different, read on.
The reasons we ditch #1.
First, if we said "no" when we did not mean it, saying it was our mistake, not the child's. We can own the mistake, take responsibility, and work to fix the problem.
Second, it's just pragmatic. The tantrum is not worth living through. There is no truly important issue on the table worth tipping the entire family and household over.
Most importantly, teens, tweens, and younger children who still tantrum tend to be (no, not brats) ... cognitively inflexible. It's a neurological thing.
Their brains gets stuck. They need to learn new skills.
They can have tremendous difficulty shifting mental sets: transitioning from one activity to another; transitioning from a preferred to non-preferred activity; adapting to changing plans, circumstances; etc.
Stress can make people even more inflexible and life, if nothing else, is highly stressful to kids who are cognitively inflexible.
Adult inflexibility is not a helpful response in the moment. It does not role model flexibility. In other words, adult stubbornness teaches and reinforces child stubbornness. Adult inflexibility supports and encourages child inflexibility.
The adults are responsible for leading by example; to model flexibility.
Try to meet inflexibility with flexibility, a maladaptive response with an adaptive response. Role model the adaptive opposite. The opposite of inflexibility is flexibility.
So, what happened to rule #1 above?
Reserve the word "no" for situations that matter.
If your 8 year old wants to camp-out in the living room, say yes. If he asks if he can build a fire pit in the middle of the floor, "no" makes perfect sense. Or, if your 12 year old asks if she can drive the car down to the store, "no" makes sense.
These are logical, hard "no" situations. Safety is at stake. You say "no" and make it stick. It's hard to argue with and it really matters.
There is always room for some skilled finesse in how you say "no", but "no" is the only possible answer in these situations.
You might say, "camping out in the living room is so much fun, but, hmmm, having a fire in the living room might turn out badly. How about if we make the fire in the back yard?"
This is saying "no", then suggesting (redirecting the child's brain to) a better idea.
You can say "no" firmly, but empathically.
Example, "sorry, Buddy, absolutely no to the fire in the living room. It's not safe. Our house will burn down."
Logical "no"s make sense. Kids can understand them even if they do not like them.
On the other hand,
- Casual "no"s
- Kneejerk "no"s
- Habitual "no"s
- Convenience "no"s
Tween arriving home from school: "Mom, can I have juice?"
Mom: "no, it's too close to dinner."
Bam! The tantrum hits in a great explosion. Swears fly, the book bad soars across the room, smashing the lamp; tween stomps off, slamming doors and crashing around.
Immediately, Mom knows her mistake. This is just not worth fighting about. What to do, what to do?
Arbitrary rules and enforcement can be infuriating, not just to children. Adults get frustrated with arbitrary rules and enforcement.
There are options.
Think for a moment about what you really mean before speaking. Instead of "no, not today", try "yes, we can do that tomorrow (or this weekend, etc)."
Think about how you frame your response. If you are not sure, be honest. For example, "hmmmm, I'm not sure. Let me think about it for a few minutes." Doing this models thinking things through. Ask a few clarifying questions: how much, how long, what's your plan?
If you say "no" then try to make it stick but eventually give in to the tantrum, you have sabotaged your authority. If you say "no" to a situation that does not matter, you come across as thoughtlessly arbitrary ... and sabotaged your authority.
It’s better if you only say “no” when you really mean “no”.
Think for a moment about what you really mean before speaking. Instead of "no, not today", try "yes, we can do that tomorrow (or this weekend, etc)."
Think about how you frame your response. If you are not sure, be honest. For example, "hmmmm, I'm not sure. Let me think about it for a few minutes." Doing this models thinking things through. Ask a few clarifying questions: how much, how long, what's your plan?
If you say "no" then try to make it stick but eventually give in to the tantrum, you have sabotaged your authority. If you say "no" to a situation that does not matter, you come across as thoughtlessly arbitrary ... and sabotaged your authority.
It’s better if you only say “no” when you really mean “no”.
If you do say 'no" when you do not mean it, do be open to changing you mind, if possible, when your child uses positive verbal reasoning skills to explain her perspective.
Allowing yourself to being “persuaded” by your child when he uses positive verbal reasoning skills is a good way to help him develop a sense that verbal reasoning skills are valuable and can be used effectively.
Using verbal reasoning skills is the positive opposite adaptive behavior to tantrums and misbehavior. This is what we want to help our children practice more of. More verbal reasoning, fewer, less severe tantrums.
Verbal reasoning is a primary life skill.
Allowing yourself to being “persuaded” by your child when he uses positive verbal reasoning skills is a good way to help him develop a sense that verbal reasoning skills are valuable and can be used effectively.
Using verbal reasoning skills is the positive opposite adaptive behavior to tantrums and misbehavior. This is what we want to help our children practice more of. More verbal reasoning, fewer, less severe tantrums.
Verbal reasoning is a primary life skill.
